Spam spam spam spam...

Back in June, aparently, the FTC said that a do-not-email list (like the do-not-call list) would not work, and would generate more spam because spammers would use it as a source of new email addresses.  Though it's a bit late now, I have to wonder about the latter point.  Why not simply map each address into its MD5 checksum before storing it?

So foo@example.com would become "a0b6e8fd2367f5999b6b4e7e1ce9e2d2" which is useless for sending email.  However, spammers could use any of many available tools to check for "hits" on their email lists, so it's still perfectly usable for filtering out email addresses.  Of course it would also tell spammers that they have a 'real' email address on their list, but only if they already had it -- so I don't think that would be giving them much information at all.

I still think the list would be useless because spammers would simply ignore it.  But it wouldn't generate new spam, and it would drive up the cost of spamming by making the threat of legal action a bit more possible.

The Noosphere Just Got Closer

Of course it'll take several years, but Google's just announced project to digitize major university library collections means that the print-only "dark matter" of the noosphere is about to be mapped out and made available to anyone with an Internet connection.  Well, at least the parts that have passed into the public domain; the rest will be indexed.

I'm clearly a geek -- my toes are tingling.

The "5th Estate"

Interesting quote, from my point of view, in this article:

Jonathan Miller, Head of AOL in the US, testifies to the popularity of Citizen's Media. He says that 60 - 70 per cent of the time people spend on AOL is devoted to ‘audience generated content'.

(Though he's talking mostly about things like message boards and chat rooms, of course, rather than blogs.)

Welcome MSN Spaces!

A surprise to welcome me back from sabbatical: Microsoft released the beta of MSN Spaces (congratulations guys!).  I've been playing with it a bit over the past few days; there's some very cool stuff there, especially the integrations between Microsoft applications. 

(I've seen a few comments about the instability of the Spaces service; come on folks, it's a beta.  And they're turning around bug fixes in 48 hours while keeping up with what has got to be a ton of traffic.)

The Atom Publishing Protocol Summarized

The slides from Joe Gregorio's XML 2004 talk about the Atom Publishing Protocol are online.  It's an excellent summary, and makes a good case for the document literal and addressable web resource approaches.  The publishing protocol is where Atom really starts to get exciting.

Software Patents Considered Harmful

This post by Paul Vick is, I think, a very honest and representative take on software patents -- and in particular the over-the-top IsNot patent -- from the point of view of an innovator.  I find myself agreeing with him wholeheartedly:

Microsoft has been as much a victim of this as anyone else, and yet we're right there in there with everyone else, playing the game. It's become a Mexican standoff, and there's no good way out at the moment short of a broad consensus to end the game at the legislative level.

And we all know how Mexican standoffs typically end.  Paul, my name is on a couple of patents which I'm not proud of either.  But in the current environment, there really isn't a choice: We're all locked in to locally 'least bad' courses, which together work to guarantee the continuation of the downward spiral (and in the long run, make all companies worse off -- other than Nathan Myhrvold's, of course.)

Web Services and KISS

Adam Bosworth argues for the 'worse is better' philosophy of web services eloquently in his ISCOC talk and blog entry.  I have a lot of sympathy for this point of view.  I'm also skeptical about the benefits of the WS-* paradigm.  They seem to me to be well designed to sell development tools and enterprise consulting services.