The combination of blogs and aggregation is so powerful not just
because these are complementary technologies in the obvious sense, but
because they promote a 'virtuous cycle' that promotes the creationa and
transformation of information. Of course this cycle is
nothing new -- it's been around since forever, through the media of
books, libraries, universities, newspapers, et cetera -- but the
blog/aggregation combination vastly speeds up the process and reduces
the transaction cost to effectively nothing. Which makes the Long Tail of the information economy accessible.
That's why the announcement of My MSN RSS aggregation with feed search is interesting; a My MSN aggregator, plus MSN Spaces
means Microsoft can leverage both sides. So they could make it
very easy, for example, to subscribe to the RSS feeds for Spaces owned
by people who comment on your blog. Or do any number of other
things which increase the value of being an MSN member. And,
obviously, these tools still interoperate with the rest of the
blogosphere (note that Spaces has had RSS feeds since launch).
Wednesday, January 12, 2005
Wednesday, December 15, 2004
Spam spam spam spam...
Back in June, aparently, the FTC said that a do-not-email list (like
the do-not-call list) would not work, and would generate more spam
because spammers would use it as a source of new email addresses.
Though it's a bit late now, I have to wonder about the latter
point. Why not simply map each address into its MD5 checksum
before storing it?
So foo@example.com would become "a0b6e8fd2367f5999b6b4e7e1ce9e2d2" which is useless for sending email. However, spammers could use any of many available tools to check for "hits" on their email lists, so it's still perfectly usable for filtering out email addresses. Of course it would also tell spammers that they have a 'real' email address on their list, but only if they already had it -- so I don't think that would be giving them much information at all.
I still think the list would be useless because spammers would simply ignore it. But it wouldn't generate new spam, and it would drive up the cost of spamming by making the threat of legal action a bit more possible.
So foo@example.com would become "a0b6e8fd2367f5999b6b4e7e1ce9e2d2" which is useless for sending email. However, spammers could use any of many available tools to check for "hits" on their email lists, so it's still perfectly usable for filtering out email addresses. Of course it would also tell spammers that they have a 'real' email address on their list, but only if they already had it -- so I don't think that would be giving them much information at all.
I still think the list would be useless because spammers would simply ignore it. But it wouldn't generate new spam, and it would drive up the cost of spamming by making the threat of legal action a bit more possible.
Tuesday, December 14, 2004
The Noosphere Just Got Closer
Of course it'll take several years, but Google's just announced project to digitize major university library collections means that the print-only "dark matter" of the noosphere
is about to be mapped out and made available to anyone with an Internet
connection. Well, at least the parts that have passed into the
public domain; the rest will be indexed.
I'm clearly a geek -- my toes are tingling.
I'm clearly a geek -- my toes are tingling.
Monday, December 13, 2004
The "5th Estate"
Interesting quote, from my point of view, in this article:
Jonathan Miller, Head of AOL in the US, testifies to the popularity of Citizen's Media. He says that 60 - 70 per cent of the time people spend on AOL is devoted to ‘audience generated content'.
(Though he's talking mostly about things like message boards and chat rooms, of course, rather than blogs.)
Jonathan Miller, Head of AOL in the US, testifies to the popularity of Citizen's Media. He says that 60 - 70 per cent of the time people spend on AOL is devoted to ‘audience generated content'.
(Though he's talking mostly about things like message boards and chat rooms, of course, rather than blogs.)
Monday, December 6, 2004
Welcome MSN Spaces!
A surprise to welcome me back from sabbatical: Microsoft released the beta of MSN Spaces
(congratulations guys!). I've been playing with it a bit over the
past few days; there's some very cool stuff there, especially the
integrations between Microsoft applications.
(I've seen a few comments about the instability of the Spaces service; come on folks, it's a beta. And they're turning around bug fixes in 48 hours while keeping up with what has got to be a ton of traffic.)
(I've seen a few comments about the instability of the Spaces service; come on folks, it's a beta. And they're turning around bug fixes in 48 hours while keeping up with what has got to be a ton of traffic.)
Wednesday, November 24, 2004
The Atom Publishing Protocol Summarized
The slides
from Joe Gregorio's XML 2004 talk about the Atom Publishing Protocol
are online. It's an excellent summary, and makes a good case for
the document literal and addressable web resource approaches. The
publishing protocol is where Atom really starts to get exciting.
Tuesday, November 23, 2004
Software Patents Considered Harmful
This post by Paul Vick is, I think, a very honest and representative take on software patents -- and in particular the over-the-top IsNot patent -- from the point of view of an innovator. I find myself agreeing with him wholeheartedly:
Microsoft has been as much a victim of this as anyone else, and yet we're right there in there with everyone else, playing the game. It's become a Mexican standoff, and there's no good way out at the moment short of a broad consensus to end the game at the legislative level.
And we all know how Mexican standoffs typically end. Paul, my name is on a couple of patents which I'm not proud of either. But in the current environment, there really isn't a choice: We're all locked in to locally 'least bad' courses, which together work to guarantee the continuation of the downward spiral (and in the long run, make all companies worse off -- other than Nathan Myhrvold's, of course.)
Microsoft has been as much a victim of this as anyone else, and yet we're right there in there with everyone else, playing the game. It's become a Mexican standoff, and there's no good way out at the moment short of a broad consensus to end the game at the legislative level.
And we all know how Mexican standoffs typically end. Paul, my name is on a couple of patents which I'm not proud of either. But in the current environment, there really isn't a choice: We're all locked in to locally 'least bad' courses, which together work to guarantee the continuation of the downward spiral (and in the long run, make all companies worse off -- other than Nathan Myhrvold's, of course.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
